publications

Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Wolf, W., Bargh, J. A., Boothby, E. J., Colman, A. M., Echterhoff, G., & Rossignac-Milon, M. (2023). Theory of collective mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Boothby, E. J.*, Cooney, G.*, & Schweitzer, M. E. (2023). Embracing complexity: A review of negotiation research. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 299-332.

Welker, Walker, Boothby, E. J., & Gilovich. (2023). Pessimistic assessments of ability in informal conversation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Sandstrom, G.*, Boothby, E. J.*, & Cooney, G.* (2022). Talking to strangers: A week-long intervention reduces barriers to social connection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

• Data and materials available publicly at: https://osf.io/b76gf/

Cooney, G.*, Boothby, E. J.*, & Lee, M. (2022). The thought gap after conversation: Underestimating the frequency of others’ thoughts about us. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(5), 1069–1088.

• Data and materials available publicly at: https://osf.io/rny4b/

Boothby, E. J. & Bohns, V. K. (2021). Why a simple act of kindness is not as simple as it seems: Underestimating the positive impact our compliments have on others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 826-840.

• Data and materials available publicly at: https://osf.io/cm4ev/

Rossignac-Milon, M, Bolger, N., Zee, K., Boothby, E. J., & Higgins, E.T. (2021). Merged minds: generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 882-911.

• Data and materials available publicly at: https://osf.io/yxq4c/

Mastroianni, A.*, Cooney, G.*, Boothby, E. J., & Reece, A. G. (2021). The liking gap in groups and teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 109-122.

• Data and materials available publicly at: https://osf.io/ndu3h/

Sandstrom, G. & Boothby, E. J. (2021). Why do people avoid talking to strangers? A mini meta-analysis of predictions and experiences. Self & Identity, 20(1), 47-71.

• Data and materials available publicly at: https://osf.io/75z24/

Boothby, E. J.*, Cooney, G.*, Sandstrom, G. M., & Clark, M. S. (2018). The liking gap in conversations: Do people like us more than we think? Psychological Science, 29(11), 1742-1756.

• Data and materials available publicly at: https://osf.io/dw5fm/

Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2017). The world looks better together: How close others enhance our visual experiences. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 694-714.

Clark, M.S., Armentano, L.A., Boothby, E., & Hirsch, J. (2017). Communal relational context (or lack thereof) shapes emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 176-183.

Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2017). The invisibility cloak illusion: People (incorrectly) believe they observe others more than others observe them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 589-606.

 Boothby, E., Smith, L.K., Clark, M.S., & Bargh, J.A. (2016). Psychological distance moderates the amplification of shared experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1431-1444. 

Boothby, E., Clark, M.S., & Bargh, J.A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2209-2216.

Clark, M.S. & Boothby, E. (2013). A strange(r) analysis of morality: A consideration of relational context and the broader literature is needed. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 36(1), 85-86.

Bargh, J.A., Schwader, K., Hailey, S., Dyer, B., & Boothby, E. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (featured article), 16(12), 593-605.

CHAPTERS

Bohns, V. K., Newark, D. A. & Boothby, E. J. (2018). When do we feel responsible for other people’s behavior and attitudes? In S. Thye & E. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes (vol. 35). New York: Emerald.

Boothby, E. & Clark, M.S. (2017). Side by side: How merely being with a familiar other can enhance well-being. In A. Kruglanski & J. Forgas (Eds.). Frontiers of Social Psychology.

Clark, M.S., Boothby, E., Clark-Polner, E., & Reis, H.T. (2014). Understanding pro-social behavior requires understanding relational context. In D.A. Schroeder & W. Graziano (Eds.) Handbook of Prosocial Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Boothby, E. & Clark, M.S. (2013). Prosocial Behavior. In McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science & Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

[* indicates equal author contribution]